Carnige essays

Carnige essays Wealth can be measured in many instances; material values or moral and character ethics for example. In society today, the amounts of money, the quantity of property or the worth of possessions dictate the level of status or way of life. These resources acquired through personal success are controlled by the successor. In Carnegies time of 1889 wealth was measured to the equivalent of today but on a more superior scale. He argues that the unequal distribution of wealth needs to be resolved. The idea of distributing wealth evenly amongst the rich and the poor is inequitable to the wealthy. Tearing and destroying a prosperous persons wealth to justify the poor mans failure to succeed disproves the American dream of opportunity. Along with that disproportionate proposal rises a problem with the ethical standing of individualism, distinctiveness and uniqueness. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness has been an American phrase since the birth of the United States. The idea of dissembling the wealth acquired by the rich and distributing it to the less fortunate contradicts this phrase. The three natural rights are guaranteed to all citizens, rich or poor. Both classes were given the ability to succeed in the areas of wealth, and to strip the accomplished of their wealth only to distribute it to others is a lengthened process called robbery. Combining class structure through equal wealth distribution is a disaster for individualism. Turning back ones ability to distinguish him compared to his challenger or neighbor allows conformity to ascend. This is another ethical contradiction of the American way where individuality is a lead trait. If the wealth structure were evened out, both classes would be tossed into a melting pot where working laboring people would be pitted against the average loaf or lethargic man. All motivation to rise above the competitor would be destroyed through distribution. ...

Bruhathkayosaurus - Facts and Figures

Bruhathkayosaurus - Facts and Figures Name: Bruhathkayosaurus (Greek for huge-bodied lizard); pronounced broo-HATH-kay-oh-SORE-us Habitat: Woodlands of India Historical Period: Late Cretaceous (70 million years ago) Size and Weight: Up to 150 feet long and 200 tons, if it really existed Diet: Plants Distinguishing Characteristics: Enormous size; long neck and tail About Bruhathkayosaurus Bruhathkayosaurus is one of those dinosaurs that comes with a lot of asterisks attached. When the remains of this animal were discovered in India, in the late 1980s, paleontologists thought they were dealing with an enormous theropod along the lines of the ten-ton Spinosaurus of northern Africa. On further examination, though, the discoverers of the type fossil speculated that Bruhathkayosaurus was actually a titanosaur, the huge, armored descendants of the sauropods that roamed every continent on earth during the Cretaceous period. The trouble is, though, that the pieces of Bruthathkayosaurus that have been identified so far dont convincingly add up to a complete titanosaur; its only classified as one because of its enormous size. For example, the supposed tibia (leg bone) of Bruhathkayosaurus was almost 30 percent bigger than that of the much-better-attested   Argentinosaurus, meaning that if it really was a titanosaur it would have been by far the biggest dinosaur of all timeas much as 150 feet long from head to tail and 200 tons. Theres a further complication, which is that the provenance of the type specimen of Bruhathkayosaurus is dubious at best. The team of researchers that unearthed this dinosaur left out some important details in their 1989 paper; for example, they included line drawings, but not actual photographs, of the recovered bones, and also didnt bother to point out any detailed diagnostic characteristics that would attest to Bruhathkayosaurus truly being a titanosaur. In fact, in the absence of hard evidence, some paleontologists believe that the alleged bones of Bruhathkayosaurus are actually pieces of petrified wood! For now, pending further fossil discoveries, Bruhathkayosaurus languishes in limbo, not quite a titanosaur and not quite the largest land-dwelling animal that ever lived. This isnt an unusual fate for recently discovered titanosaurs; pretty much the same can be said about Amphicoelias and Dreadnoughtus, two other violently disputed contenders for the title of Biggest Dinosaur Ever.